Tổng số lượt xem trang

Thứ Bảy, 26 tháng 5, 2012

Imaging Findings in Salmonella Infections

Spectrum of Imaging Findings in Salmonella Infections

  1. Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
  1. 1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074.
  2. 2 Department of Radiology, Maximilian University, Unterhaching, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Radiologic findings in Salmonella infections are not well described. In most patients, Salmonella infections produce mild and self-limiting clinical manifestations and therefore are treated empirically with antibiotics. Radiologic investigations are usually performed for patients with severe clinical manifestations or complications and for patients with unusual findings.
CONCLUSION. This pictorial essay illustrates various imaging findings in culture-proven cases of Salmonella infection, described broadly as common and uncommon manifestations.
Salmonella species are gram-negative facultative intracellular anaerobes that can cause a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations [1]. The clinical spectrum of infection ranges from gastroenteritis, enteric fever (caused by typhoid and paratyphoid serotypes), Salmonella bacteremia, and localized infections to a convalescent lifetime carrier state [2]. The manifestation of disease is dependent on the serotype and various host factors. More than 2500 serovars of genusSalmonella have been described [3], some of which, such as S. typhi, are restricted only to human hosts [1].
Salmonella infection most commonly begins with ingestion of bacteria in contaminated food and water. Once a person is infected, the organism can spread from person to person via the fecal-oral route [4]. The bacterium proliferates in the intestine and can then penetrate the lymphoid tissue of the gastrointestinal tract, usually in the distal ileal loops and terminal ileum, leading to hematologic dissemination and transmission of the organism to various organ systems [5].
Salmonella infection can be endemic, particularly in developing countries. However, an increased incidence of this infection is emerging in developed countries secondary to the prevalence of immunocompromised conditions with the ongoing surge of HIV infection and the evolution of antibiotic resistance. This pictorial essay thus aims to illustrate the various clinical manifestations ofSalmonella infection, taking into account the changing global environment.

Common Manifestations

Gastrointestinal

A large inoculum of Salmonella species is needed to overcome stomach acidity and compete with normal intestinal flora for an established infection of the intestine. The bacterium then proliferates in the small intestine and invades enterocytes in the distal ileum and colon. Elaboration of several toxins by the bacterium contributes to the dysfunction of the intestinal cells [4].
Small-intestine infection may be seen as symmetric and homogeneous thickening of the ileal wall, which may be focal or diffuse on CT (Fig. 1). A feathery pattern of mucosal thickening may also be seen on ultrasound (Fig. 2). Sometimes colonic involvement can be seen in the absence of ileal involvement and may be patchy or continuous (Fig. 3). Salmonella enteritis may even simulate pseudomembranous colitis, with toxic megacolon as a known complication [6]. Enlarged mesenteric nodes may be seen adjacent to the involved segment of intestine (Fig. 4).

Gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation are important complications and occur frequently in the terminal ileum [7]. Active bleeding may be visualized in the form of intravascular contrast extravasation on CT angiography studies (Fig. 5).

Hepatobiliary and Splenic

The gallbladder and spleen are common sites of intraabdominal Salmonella infections, and the manifestations can range from nonspecific organomegaly (Fig. 6) to an abscess formation (Fig. 7). Rarely, the spleen may rupture secondary to splenomegaly after trivial trauma.
Acute acalculous cholecystitis is a recognized manifestation of Salmonella infection [8]. Gallbladder wall thickening, distention, and pericholecystic fluid can be seen on both ultrasound and CT (Figs. 8A and 8B). Perforation and empyema of the gallbladder and Salmonella cholangitis are also recognized but rare entities [9].

Mesenteric and Peritoneal

Ascites, localized or generalized mesenteric stranding, thickening, and adenopathy are frequent manifestations of Salmonella infection [10]. Salmonella infections have a predilection for the gastrointestinal tract. Involvement of the terminal ileum or the proximal colon with mesenteric lymphadenopathy may be specific imaging findings.

Uncommon Manifestations

Genitourinary

The manifestations of Salmonella infection in the genitourinary tract are nonspecific and do not differ clinically from the manifestations of urinary tract infections secondary to other Enterobacteriaceae [11]. They range from asymptomatic bacteriuria to cystitis, pyelonephritis, and renal abscess formation (Figs. 9A and 9B). Salmonella infection in a preexisting hydrocele, ovarian cyst, and even epididymoorchitis have been reported [12].

Pulmonary and Cardiac

Several nonspecific abnormalities are observed on chest radiography, including pleurisy, pleural effusion, bronchopneumonia, and lobar pneumonia (Fig. 10). Endocarditis, myocarditis, and pericarditis also have been described [13].

Vascular

Arterial—Although arterial infection due to Salmonella bacteria is unusual, it remains one of the most common causes of infective aneurysms [14]. Most infections occur in preexisting atherosclerotic foci or in an aneurysm, and the risk of infective aneurysms secondary to Salmonella infection is thereby significantly increased in patients older than 50 years.
The most common site of infection is the abdominal aorta. CT findings may reveal a periaortic gas collection, an interrupted ring of aortic wall, or a rapidly enlarging saccular structure arising from the aortic wall (Figs. 11A and 11B). These aneurysms are at risk of causing life-threatening rupture and hemorrhage (Figs.12A and 12B).
Venous—Thrombophlebitis of the veins can also occur, as illustrated by intraluminal filling defects on contrast-enhanced examinations (Figs. 13A and13B).

CNS

Salmonella meningitis occurs most commonly in infants [15]. Contrast-enhanced MRI is useful in suspected cases because it reveals meningeal enhancement. Encephalitis in the form of increased signal on FLAIR and T2-weighted sequences and abnormal enhancement may be seen (Figs. 14A, 14B, and 14C). Complications such as hydrocephalus, ventriculitis, and cerebral abscesses can then follow in untreated cases.

Musculoskeletal

The skeletal and soft-tissue infections due to Salmonella infection occur mostly in patients with preexisting diseases. The association between sickle cell disease and Salmonella osteomyelitis is well known. Other manifestations include polymyositis, septic arthritis, periosteitis, and abscess formation. MRI plays an important role in the imaging of musculoskeletal complications (Figs. 15A and15B).

Soft Tissues

Soft-tissue infections are often indolent with a paucity of systemic symptoms. The imaging features are no different from those of abscesses due to any other cause and may not be suspected until culture of a surgically obtained specimen is performed. Superficial abscesses are quite common, with abscesses in the parotid, breast, pancreas, and thyroid having been reported in the literature [14].

Conclusion

A wide spectrum of radiologic manifestations due to Salmonella infection may be encountered, especially in endemic areas and immunocompromised patients. However, the imaging findings in Salmonella infection are not unique and can mimic other infective diseases. Knowledge of radiologic manifestations is important to aid in early diagnosis and timely initiation of appropriate management. In our experience, in the appropriate clinical setting, radiologic findings of thickened terminal ileum or proximal colon with mesenteric lymphadenopathy are specific for Salmonella infection.

ROI Shear-wave Elastography Measurement Method


We read with great interest the article by Arda et al. [1], “Quantitative Assessment of Normal Soft-Tissue Elasticity Using Shear-Wave Ultrasound Elastography,” in the September 2011 issue of the AJR. The authors quantitatively measured the elasticity (in kilopascals) of various normal tissues in healthy volunteers to create a formal basis of reference. Promising ultrasound techniques include the following: Elastography tracks tissue motion during compression to obtain strain estimates, sonoelastography uses color Doppler signal to image tissue motion in response to probe vibrations, and tracking of shear wave propagation through tissue provides elastic modulus values. A major drawback of color qualitative elastography is its high intra- and interobserver variability associated with iterative ultrasound probe compression [2].
Compared with other elasticity imaging techniques, shear-wave elastography can measure local mechanical tissue properties almost independently from adjacent tissues. Additionally, shear-wave elastography does not require external deformation means or a vibration source. Shear-wave elastography gives real-time quantitative information about tissue stiffness by measuring and displaying local tissue elasticity on a color-coded map (Fig. 1). Thus, shear-wave elastography is theoretically insensitive to target size and allows interobserver reproducibility, quality, and accuracy using automatic tissue stiffness measurement in regions of interest (ROIs) [1, 3, 4]. However, recent studies by Arda et al. [1] and Sebag et al. [4] lack precise technical criteria to assess healthy tissue elasticity [1, 4]—namely, the number of ultrasound elastographic acquisitions performed per tissue analysis; matching of ROI values assessed by two independent observers; and the ROI shear-wave elastography measurement method, including location, size, number, and acquisition plane. This last issue is particularly important in anisotropic tissues, such as the thyroid gland or even more in the muscle tendons. In the study by Arda et al., variations of elasticity values approached 100% between the axial and longitudinal planes for the Achilles tendon, but the plane that was chosen as a formal reference was not specified.

Fig. 1
Single-shot 3D shear-wave elastography in 50-year-old patient with healthy thyroid.
A–D, Axial (A), longitudinal (B), and coronal (C) plane ultrasound images are secondarily reformatted using single source of data. Three-dimension acquisition of right thyroid lobe is shown (D). The region of interest (ROI) shear-wave elastography calculation is made secondarily on each plane by placing ROI in target area on color maps of elastography images. Elastography values (mean stiffness, maximum, minimum, and SD) are displayed instantaneously on each reformatted plane.
Furthermore, variations in the ultrasound probe pressure also might induce significant variations in the ROI shear-wave elastography calculation. The probe pressure helps to chase the bowel air to target the pancreas but may induce organ elasticity assessment errors as it can in superficial organs (Fig. 2). Determining the ROI ratio of the target tissue to the reference adjacent tissue values (muscle, fat, normal adjacent tissue versus pathology area) should thus improve the reproducibility of shear-wave elastography.
Using a 3D single-shot volume acquisition of the target organ with secondary calculation limits the risk of error in ROI calculation of probe pressure variability compared with successive axial and longitudinal plane calculations (Fig. 1). Moreover, establishing a ratio is a way to compensate for ROI calculation variability along the axis related to probe pressure.
In conclusion, to limit intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative elastography [3, 4], we emphasize the necessity of establishing a wide range of normal and pathologic tissue shear-wave elastography values measured along the same (longitudinal or axial) axis, performed—if possible—on a single 3D acquisition and using a systematic ROI ratio. We advocate an accurate definition of the formal assessment technique of ROI shear-wave elastography calculation.

Fig. 2
Variations of region of interest (ROI) calculation as function of probe pressure in 50-year-old patient with healthy thyroid (same patient as inFig. 1).
A and B, Axial (A) and longitudinal (B) axis images with same patient and same ROI location and size as in Figure 1 show ROI values vary from one to double (no compression, 1; mild compression, 2; strong probe compression, 3). Q-Box quantification tool manufactured by Medivision Benelux.