VTI on ARFI: A NEW TECHNIQUE for BENIGN and MALIGNANT THYROID NODULES

Abstract


Objectives—Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography is a newly developed ultrasound elasticity imaging technique that included both Virtual Touch tissue quantification and Virtual Touch tissue imaging (VTI; Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA). This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of VTI in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.

 Methods—This study included 192 consecutive patients with thyroid nodules (n = 219) who underwent surgery for compressive symptoms or suspicion of malignancy. Tissue stiffness on VTI elastography was scored from 1 (soft) to 6 (hard). The VTI scores between malignant and benign thyroid nodules were compared. The intraobserver and interobserver agreement for VTI elastography was also assessed.

Results—On VTI elastography: score 1 was found in 84 nodules (all benign); score 2 in 37 nodules (3 papillary carcinomas and 34 benign nodules); score 3 in 25 nodules (1 medullary carcinoma, 6 papillary carcinomas, and 18 benign nodules); score 4 in 53 nodules (50 papillary carcinomas and 3 benign nodules); score 5 in 17 nodules (14 papillary carcinomas and 3 benign nodules); and score 6 in 3 nodules (all papillary carcinomas). A VTI elasticity score of 4 or greater was highly predictive of malignancy (P< .01), and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 87.0% (67 of 77), 95.8% (136 of 142), 91.8% (67 of 73), 93.1% (136 of 146), and 92.7% (203 of 219), respectively. The κ values were 0.69 for intraobserver agreement and 0.85 for interobserver agreement.

Conclusions—Virtual Touch tissue elasticity imaging has great potential as an adjunctive tool combined with conventional sonography for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

RTE of BENIGN and MALIGNANT CERVICAL LESIONS

Objectives—This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant cervical lesions and to compare the accuracy of the elasticity score and strain ratio in differentiating cervical lesions.
Methods—B-mode sonography and ultrasound elastography were performed on 84 cervical lesions (40 benign and 44 malignant) in 84 patients. All of the images were obtained transvaginally. The elasticity score was determined by a 5-point scoring method. Calculation of the strain ratio was based on a comparison of the average strain measured in the lesion with the adjacent tissue of the same depth, size, and shape. The
findings were compared with histopathologic results. With the use of receiver operating characteristic curves, the diagnostic value of the elasticity score and strain ratio methods was determined.
Results—The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the elasticity score in the differential diagnosis of cervical lesions were 81.8%, 85.0%, 83.3%, 85.7%, and 81.0%, respectively, whereas those of the strain ratio were 90.9%, 90.0%, 90.5%, 90.9%, and 90.0%. A strain ratio cutoff value of 4.525 was used as a standard to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. The strain ratio values of malignant lesions were much higher than those of benign lesions (range, 4.85–8.91
versus 0.62–4.50). The differences were statistically significant (P < .01).

Conclusions—Ultrasound elastography is a promising technique that is easy and rapid to perform and can help identify cervical lesions that are likely to be malignant. It is obvious that the strain ratio yielded better results than the elasticity score. Both methods are semiquantitative, but quantification of the strain ratio is finer than that of the elasticity score.


Key Words—cervical lesions; elasticity score; gynecologic ultrasound; strain ratio; ultrasound elastography