Tổng số lượt xem trang

Thứ Sáu, 5 tháng 6, 2020

PoCUS for Syncope

Point-of-care ultrasound to complete physical exam and to reach the diagnosis in a young man with syncope

Abstract

Background

Cardiac syncope can result from an atrial myxoma due to outflow obstruction. Myxoma is the most common primary cardiac tumor that may cause sudden death and the nonspecific symptoms may make early diagnosis difficult.

Case presentation

A 27-year-old man presented to our emergency department after two episodes of syncope and severe fatigue. He had no complaint of fever, weight loss, sweating, chest pain or dyspnea. Vital signs were within normal limits. A loud heart S1 was detected and normal neck veins. Other systemic examinations including neurological assessment were normal. Electrocardiography showed normal sinus rhythm. An obvious variability in heart rate was noticed on cardiac monitor changing by the patient’s position. Point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) showed a large hyperechoic lesion with a well-defined stalk originating from the left atrium (LA). Thus, the patient was transferred to a cardiac surgery center for surgical intervention. Histopathology reported an LA mass compatible with myxoma.

Conclusions

Emergency physicians should be familiar with the vague presentations of cardiac tumors to improve patient outcomes. It is beneficial to take advantage of bedside ultrasound for prompt diagnosis and subsequent treatment.

Feasibility of renal resistive index

Feasibility of renal resistive index measurements performed by an intermediate and novice sonographer in a volunteer population

Abstract

Background

The Doppler-derived renal resistive index (RRI) is emerging as a promising bedside tool for assessing renal perfusion and risk of developing acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. It is not known what level of ultrasonography competence is needed to obtain reliable RRI values.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of RRI measurements by an intermediate and novice sonographer in a volunteer population.

Methods

After a focused teaching session, an intermediate (resident), novice (medical student) and expert sonographer performed RRI measurements in 23 volunteers consecutively and blinded to the results of one another. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate interobserver reliability, bias and precision.

Results

Both non-experts were able to obtain RRI values in all volunteers. Median RRI in the population measured by the expert was 0.58 (interquartile range 0.52–0.62). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.90–0.98) for the intermediate and expert, and 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.69–0.94) for the novice and expert. In relation to the measurements of the expert, both non-experts showed negligible bias (mean difference 0.002 [95% confidence interval − 0.005 to 0.009, p = 0.597] between intermediate and expert, mean difference 0.002 [95% confidence interval − 0.011 to 0.015, p = 0.752] between novice and expert) and clinically acceptable precision (95% limits of agreement − 0.031 to 0.035 for the intermediate, 95% limits of agreement − 0.056 to 0.060 for the novice).

Conclusions

RRI measurements by both an intermediate and novice sonographer in a volunteer population were reliable, accurate and precise after a brief course. RRI is easy to learn and feasible within the scope of point-of-care ultrasound.