Tổng số lượt xem trang

Thứ Bảy, 21 tháng 11, 2020

The Focused Assessment with Sonography in Cancer (FASC) Examination

 

Peter C. Nauka; MD1; Benjamin T. Galen, MD2

(1) Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Residency Training Program, Bronx, NY, USA.

(2) Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.


Download article PDF – POCUS Journal 2020; 5(2):42-45.


Abstract

Malignant effusions occur frequently in patients with cancer and are important to diagnose and treat. In this report, we describe a novel point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocol to rapidly identify pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, and ascites: The Focused Assessment with Sonography in Cancer (FASC). This protocol utilizes six standard sonographic positions to identify the presence of fluid in common anatomic spaces. The FASC examination is intended for widespread use by oncologists and other clinicians who treat patients with cancer. 

Introduction

Clinicians in oncology, emergency medicine, hospital medicine, and primary care frequently encounter patients with cancer who develop fluid accumulation in the pleural, pericardial, abdominal, and pelvic spaces. Both solid tumor metastases and hematologic malignancies have the potential to cause third spacing of intravascular fluids via seeding to and disruption of serosal membranes and normal endothelium [1,2]. We propose a Focused Assessment with Sonography in Cancer (FASC) examination using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to enable all clinicians to routinely and rapidly assess patients for pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, and ascites. Similar to other POCUS protocols like the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) examination, the FASC examination uses six views to detect fluid (Figure 1) [3,4].



Figure 1. Protocol for Focused Assessment with Sonography in Cancer (FASC) Examination. Progression of scanning follows numbering from 1 to 6.

Third-space fluid accumulation leads to a range of symptoms for patients with cancer that can significantly reduce quality of life [3-5].  Life-threatening complications, such as cardiac tamponade from a rapidly accumulating pericardial effusion, are important to detect expediently.  Monitoring for recurrence of fluid accumulation in the pleural, pericardial, abdominal, and pelvic spaces is important in longitudinal outpatient care.  Palliative procedures, such as intermittent drainage and indwelling catheters can decrease symptom burden from malignant exudates. The potential benefit for FASC examination is to diagnose and track fluid accumulation easily at the bedside or in the office, using POCUS as an adjunct to physical examination.

POCUS is a portable, low-cost, and increasingly popular imaging modality in widespread use by many clinicians, but not yet by oncologists and hematologists [6]. The use of POCUS in identifying fluid accumulation in potential spaces has been very well-established [7]. This modality is well tolerated by patients and has excellent sensitivity and specificity compared to computerized tomography imaging (Table 1) [8-10].

Table 1. Test characteristics of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in finding fluid.   The diagnosis of pleural effusion and ascites were compared to computerized tomography imaging. Sensitivity and specificity for pericardial effusion were determined by comparing image interpretation by non-cardiologists to echocardiography boarded cardiologists (9, 10).

 

Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Sensitivity

Specificity

Pleural Effusion

Visualization of effusion

93%

96%

Ascites

Visualization of fluid

96%

82%

Pericardial Effusion

Visualization of fluid

96%

98%

FASC Examination

Setup and Patient Positioning

The goal of the FASC examination should be explained to the patient and family. Reassurance should be offered that the FASC examination is not painful and does not use ionizing radiation.  For the FASC examination, the patient should be placed in the supine or semi-recumbent position. The patient should place both hands comfortably behind the head; this can improve visualization through the intercostal spaces [11]. Flexion of the hips and knees will relax abdominal muscles for optimal windows [11]. 

Depending on availability, either a phased array probe (typically 2 Mhz – 7.4 Mhz) or curvilinear transducer probe (2 – 5 Mhz) can be used for the entire FASC examination.  Users should be familiar with basic adjustments on their machine, such as gain and depth.  In conventional probe orientation for POCUS, the probe indicator is placed towards the patient’s right or towards the head, except for the subxiphoid cardiac view, which uses cardiology orientation (indicator to patient’s left).  

Position 1 and 4. Detecting Pleural Effusions and Ascites in the Upper Abdominal Quadrants

The ultrasound probe should initially be placed in the mid-axillary line at the level of the xiphoid process with the indicator towards the patient’s head. The diaphragm should be visualized along with the liver in position 1 and the spleen in position 4 (Figure 1).  In addition, the kidneys and thoracic spine should be identified in the abdomen. This usually requires sliding up and down between ribs spaces, sweeping the probe posteriorly, and tilting in the anterior-posterior plane. The thoracic spine can be identified because ultrasound waves reflect of bone, creating the hyperechoic appearance of the vertebral bodies with anechoic shadows deep to them. With the probe in the mid-axillary line, the vertebral column can be identified at the bottom of the screen. Normal aerated lung does not provide an acoustic window to visualize any deeper structures, thus the spine is only seen when there is pathology at the lung base, such as a pleural effusion. Visualization of the thoracic spine above the diaphragm is referred to as the “spine sign,” which confirms that pathology (such as pleural effusion) is not an artifact. The absence of a pleural effusion is often noted by a positive “lung curtain sign,” in which pleural sliding and A-lines are seen at the lung base during inspiration [12].  When present, a pleural effusion is anechoic (black) and if large enough will lead to atelectasis of the nearby lung (Figure 2, Supplementary Video 1, 2).  Loculations can be present in highly exudative pleural fluid. It is important to identify the thoracic spine posterior to pleural effusions (positive “spine sign”) to rule out artifact [13].  Rib artifacts and reflection across the diaphragm can lead to hypoechoic and anechoic findings above the diaphragm, but these will not have a positive spine sign. 


Figure 2: Sample FASC Examination images. FASC position 1: right pleural effusion. FASC position 2: right lower abdominal ascites. FASC position 3: a pericardial effusion. FASC position 4: a left pleural effusion. FASC position 5: lower abdominal quadrant ascites. FASC position 6: pelvic ascites around the bladder. White arrows indicate anechoic fluid collections.

Video S1. Video clip of FASC position 1: right pleural effusion.

Video S2. Video clip of FASC position 4: left pleural effusion.

In the supine position, ascites collects in the dependent locations, such as the sub-diaphragmatic space (Figure 2).  Sliding the probe inferiorly from the diaphragm level when in position 1 and 4 allows for identification of the hepatorenal recess (Morrison’s pouch) and splenorenal recess, respectively. This fluid will be detected by its anechoic (black) appearance on ultrasound and requires correct identification of nearby structures.  A fluid filled stomach, loops of bowel, or renal cysts can mimic ascites.

Position 2 and 5. Detecting Ascites in the lower abdominal quadrants

The probe is placed on the right lower or left lower abdominal quadrants and should be tilted anterior to posterior and rocked cranial to caudad to visualize positions 2 and 5 (Supplementary Video 3, 4).  In abdominal carcinomatosis, ascites might be loculated with hyper-echoic (white) strands in the anechoic (black) fluid. 

Video S3. Video clip of FASC position 2: right lower abdominal ascites.

Video S4. Video clip of FASC position 5: lower abdominal quadrant ascites.

Position 3. Subxiphoid Cardiac Window to Detect Pericardial Effusion

Pericardial effusions are common in patients with cancer and can lead to cardiac tamponade, particularly if the fluid accumulates rapidly [14]. The subxiphoid cardiac view is ideal for assessing the presence or absence of pericardial effusion (Figure 2, Supplementary Video 5). The probe should be placed inferior to the xiphoid process with the indicator pointed to the patient’s left (cardiology orientation).  Care should be taken not to apply excessive pressure.  The ultrasound probe is rocked to the patient’s left, using the liver as an acoustic window to view the heart and pericardial space.  When present, a pericardial effusion is anechoic (black), but can have echogenic loculations or fibrin strands [11].  Some pericardial effusions are mobile and collect in dependent areas based on positioning [11].  Assessing for cardiac tamponade physiology is a more advanced POCUS skill: new, symptomatic, or large pericardial effusions in patients with cancer found on FASC examination should prompt referral for further evaluation. 

Video S5. Video clip of FASC position 3: pericardial fluid.

Position 6. Pelvic view to detect ascites

The pelvis is another dependent area where ascites can be visualized. The probe is placed superior to the pubic symphysis and pointed inferiorly and posteriorly with the indicator to patient’s right (Supplementary Video 6). The probe can be tilted anteriorly to posteriorly and rocked left to right to improve visualization. It is important to identify the bladder so that urine is not mistaken for ascites. Ascites, when present, can be visualized anterior to, posterior to, or lateral to the bladder.     

Video S6. Video clip of FASC position 6: pelvic ascites around the bladder.

Conclusions

Pleural effusions, pericardial effusions, and ascites are commonly diagnosed in patients with cancer. POCUS is a useful adjunct to the physical examination in detecting, monitoring, and draining these effusions. While POCUS is not currently in widespread use by oncologists, trainees are increasingly learning POCUS in medical school and internal medicine residency [15-21].  The FASC protocol contains views that are easily obtained and have been validated for use by clinicians in many other specialties. We anticipate that oncologists will find learning and independently performing the FASC protocol very rewarding. The FASC examination might allow oncologists to monitor their patients in clinic and in the hospital for fluid accumulation.  For oncologists who are not trained in POCUS, there are many opportunities to learn POCUS in the continuing medical education setting.  Emergency medical providers, hospitalists, and primary care providers currently using POCUS can easily incorporate the FASC examination into their practice [22-24].  Further work is necessary to determine the right amount of training to competently perform the FASC examination.

Thứ Ba, 17 tháng 11, 2020

Testicular Cancer Risk

 

Three Diagnostic Scans Is Enough to Increase Testicular Cancer Risk 60 Percent

November 11, 2020

Study supports testicular shielding and efforts to reduce radiation in men and children during diagnostic scans.

X-rays and CT scans can be critical diagnostic tools. But, for men who are exposed to the radiation repeatedly or early in their lives, these imaging studies can increase the risk of testicular cancer by more than half.

Testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) is the most common form of cancer in younger men, ages 15 to 45 – and the incidence is rising. In 1975, only three in 100,000 men were diagnosed. But, today, six out of every 100,000 men get the diagnosis with nearly 9,500 cases expected by the end of 2020. However, the reason behind the spike has been unclear.

A team from Penn Medicine set out to find out what the cause might be. They published their results, which could lead to changes in how these imaging scans are conducted, on Nov. 11 in PLOS ONE.

For more coverage based on industry expert insights and research, subscribe to the Diagnostic Imaging e-Newsletter here.

“The steady rise in testicular germ cell tumor cases over the past three or four decades suggests there is an environmental exposure risk at play, but no definitive risk factor has ever been identified,” said senior author Katherine L. Nathanson, M.D., deputy director of Penn Medicine’s Abramson Cancer Center. “Our data suggest that the increased use of diagnostic radiation below the waist in men over that same time may contribute to the increase in incidence.”

Currently, there is limited data looking at how the diagnostic radiation from X-rays and CT scans in clinical care could be involved in TGCT, said Nathanson, who is also the Pearl Basser Professor of BRCA-Related Research at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. Instead, previous studies have examined the impact of occupational exposures, such as from the military or nuclear workers.

Consequently, to pinpoint whether these studies do, in fact, affect the development of TGCT, the team, that was led by Kevin Nead, M.D., before he moved from Penn Medicine to MD Anderson Cancer Center, conducted an observational study that included 1,246 men between ages 18 and 55 who both did and did not have testicular cancer. Participants provided details, via questionnaire, on any imaging prior to diagnosis conducted during their lifetimes, including body location and number of exposures. Tumor samples were also included.

Based on their evaluations, the team discovered that diagnostic radiation exposure did create a statistically significant increase in the risk for testicular cancer. After adjusting for known risk factors for the disease, including cryptorchidism, family history, age, and race, they found that men with at least three exposures to X-ray, including colon X-ray, and CT below the waist had a 59-percent increased risk for TGCT than men who received no diagnostic radiation. The risk was also higher for men who had these scans during their first 10 years of life. 

“If our results are validated, efforts to reduce medically unnecessary and avoidable testicular exposure should be considered,” the team said, “in part through efforts to reduce radiation dose and optimize shielding practices when appropriate.”


Thứ Ba, 10 tháng 11, 2020

Ultrasound: The 60-year-old modality of the future

 

Ultrasound: The 60-year-old modality of the future

By Theresa Pablos, AuntMinnie staff writer

November 10, 2020 -- Ultrasound has been around forever. It suffers from low resolution. It hasn't had the same buzzworthy advancements seen in other imaging modalities. But that's changing, thanks to new technologies redefining how ultrasound is performed -- and who gets to perform it.

What's the result? Leading radiologists are increasingly pointing to ultrasound as the imaging method of the future.

"There are a lot of interesting things happening that I hope will reelevate the status of ultrasound within radiology," said Dr. Brian Coley, the radiologist in chief at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and one of the expert radiologists who think ultrasound is due for a revamp.

Numerous trends are contributing to the likely reelevation in ultrasound's status in radiology, including a broadening of the user base, a push toward value-based care, and advancements making the technology cheaper, smaller, and more durable. The intersection of these trends presents a unique opportunity -- and challenge -- for radiologists.

"With the democratization of ultrasound and the ubiquity of use among other specialists, radiologists need to up their game if they want to maintain their position as the overall experts in ultrasound," Coley said.

AI, contrast, and other ultrasound improvements at RSNA

The research presented at the RSNA 2020 virtual meeting will offer radiologists one way to learn about ultrasound innovations and up their game. The conference will cover a number of cutting-edge ultrasound topics driving improvements in quality and accuracy.

Jerome Liang, PhD
Jerome Liang, PhD.

RSNA Physics Chair Jerome Liang, PhD, pointed to exciting new research on emerging sensor technology to improve image quality, as well as the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for signal processing. Meanwhile, RSNA Pediatric Radiology Chair Dr. Lynn Fordham is excited about research and discussion on contrast-enhanced ultrasound applications.

"The use of ultrasound contrasts is really an exciting new direction -- everything from analyzing liver lesions to using contrast for voiding cystourethrograms," she said.

For RSNA Vascular and Interventional Radiology Chair Dr. Ronald Arellano, miniaturization is one of the most exciting topics in all of radiology, and nowhere is that more evident than in ultrasound. It's a revolution he's witnessed firsthand during his vascular radiology career.

For instance, Arellano distinctly remembers a surgery internship where he held retractors for six hours while the surgeon created a surgical shunt between the portal and hepatic veins. Now, he can use intravascular ultrasound to get the same result in 20 minutes with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic (TIPS) shunt.

"Having intravascular ultrasound now to help to create that TIPS shunt, to watch in real-time the needle traversing the hepatic vein into the portal vein ... I see that as a major advancement," he said.

Vendors will no doubt be virtually showcasing the next generation of even-smaller tools for ultrasound systems at RSNA 2020. Arellano firmly believes that miniaturization will continue to revolutionize ultrasound-guided procedures in the future.

For instance, one day, he foresees interventional radiologists being able to use ultrasound to guide procedures in the biliary system of the liver and other small, nonvascular channels. Liang said that work to further miniaturize ultrasound equipment is already underway.

Another area ripe with research potential -- and a surefire topic at this year's RSNA meeting -- is the use of artificial intelligence. AI advancements are notoriously challenging for ultrasound because the modality is highly dependent on the user, Fordham noted.

Dr. Lynn Fordham
Dr. Lynn Fordham.

Despite the inherent difficulties, researchers and vendors have slowly expanded the number of AI applications for ultrasound. Dr. Fiona Gilbert, the RSNA chair for breast imaging, is one of the clinicians eagerly awaiting more AI ultrasound applications.

"Whole-breast ultrasound is quite a time-consuming examination for the radiologist to scroll through all the images," she said. "To have really good AI detection tools for ultrasound would be fantastic. They're being developed, so we're hoping they're going to become available shortly."

The use of synoptic reporting -- a type of structured reporting -- could also expedite future ultrasound AI applications, noted Dr. Christopher Roth, a neuroradiologist and director of imaging informatics strategy at Duke Health.

"Synoptic reporting is like what you would do when filling out a survey form," Roth said. "It's yes/no. Structured questions with structured answers. Doing ultrasound artificial intelligence is really difficult. ... Having structured data that can be associated with the pixel data does open up some possibilities."

Other exciting areas of ultrasound include the use of one-touch features and other tools to address repetitive stress injuries experienced by sonographers. In addition, current ultrasound-guided procedures could potentially be expanded into new organ systems or use cases.

Overall, the experts are excited by the developments making ultrasound technology and image quality even better -- and they don't see that trend slowing down any time soon.

"Ultrasound may have more and more development and advances over the next 10 to 15 years," Liang said.

Radiologists and the point-of-care revolution

Excitement around new diagnostic and technological capabilities has fueled renewed interest in ultrasound use and research among radiologists. Fordham pointed to new grant funding provided by the Society of Pediatric Radiology for pediatric ultrasound research as evidence of that interest.

Dr. Ronald Arellano
Dr. Ronald Arellano.

"Radiologists are recognizing the clinical utility and are successfully able to write grants for funds to further their work," she said.

Coley and Roth added that the shift to value-based payment models may also be driving an increase in radiologist interest in ultrasound.

"Imagers are becoming more aware -- or being forced to become more aware -- of the need to provide value," Coley said. "Ultrasound has a convincing case as a high-value diagnostic tool."

Coley hypothesized that significant payment reform, such as using encounter-based payment models and bundling care, would make ultrasound an even more financially attractive modality in the future.

Roth took that line of thinking one step further.

"Ultrasound is an inexpensive imaging modality that is going to be encouraged more and more if it's diagnostically efficacious enough in coming years, instead of more expensive modalities like CT and MRI," he said.

The excitement around ultrasound -- technologically or financially -- is a departure from recent trends. By and large, interest in ultrasound had largely fallen by the wayside among radiologists, Coley said.

Coley cited a number of reasons for this, including that performing ultrasound scans takes time and effort, resources that are in increasingly short supply for radiologists. Radiologists have also focused their attention on other modalities.

"Look, other modalities are very cool and, for many, have greater sex appeal," Coley said.

This lack of radiologist attention on ultrasound is perhaps most apparent in the research on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for COVID-19 imaging. While radiology has largely focused on CT, emergency physicians have stepped in to fill the ultrasound knowledge gap.

"Generally radiologists have not been that involved in ultrasound of the chest, but it's what's available to those point-of-care physicians," Roth said. "In many cases, they are taking a look at COVID patients under ultrasound, and they're doing their own research."

Dr. Fiona Gilbert
Dr. Fiona Gilbert.

Emergency physicians taking the lead in research on the use of POCUS for COVID-19 reflects broader trends in point-of-care at hospitals. Physicians of all stripes are increasingly using POCUS across the entire care continuum.

The experts all agreed that this trend is being driven by cheaper, better, and smaller devices -- and that it's for the benefit of patients.

"It's great that there's so much more access," Fordham said. "The challenge is to make sure that all of the folks who are using ultrasound have some quality standards in place. And that is a little bit of a challenge."

"A little bit of a challenge" may be an understatement. In coming years, hospitals are going to have to grapple with creating encounter-based workflows that work for different types of providers in different locations. They're also going to have to create ultrasound credentialing and privileging processes for new types of physicians, residents, fellows, and medical students.

At this point in time, the experts agreed that there are far more questions than answers. But the answers to those questions will be determined by decisions being made today, Roth noted.

"Decisions around credentialing and privileging, when to bill, how to handle trainees, what role is radiology going to be, educating the trainees and attending providers around the enterprise -- those decisions are getting made now," Roth said. "If they're not on the ball, the decisions will get made without radiologists."

Both Roth and Coley said this is an excellent opportunity for radiologists to step in as imaging leaders within healthcare institutions. For Roth, this responsibility is tied to radiologists' role as the stewards of good imaging. Coley expressed a similar stance.

"Radiology has an advantage in understanding the totality of medical imaging," he said. "It is still in a position to facilitate sensible imaging pathways."

Roth offered five concrete steps radiologists can take today to shape the future of ultrasound use at their institutions:

  1. Offer guidance to providers and specialties already capturing ultrasound.
  2. Consider sharing image software with other specialties with appropriate oversight.
  3. Keep tabs on budgetary decisions regarding new ultrasound purchases.
  4. Talk to referrers to learn radiology blind spots.
  5. Get involved in credentialing and privileging committees.

While these steps are not necessarily easy, Roth said they are critically important for radiologists. After all, good imaging is fundamental to patient care, no matter where it happens.

"It's not reimbursed. It's not necessarily a sexy job. But it is something that is critically important to patient care," he said. "Radiologists need to be the stewards of good imaging at the hospitals in which they work."

Programming schedule

Ultrasound sessions on the virtual RSNA 2020 program.

Thursday, December 3

  • 3:30 pm-4:30 p.m. -- Education Session: Hepatobiliary Sonography 2020: Update Controversies

Friday, December 4

  • 10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. -- Education Session: Thyroid Sonography: At a Tipping Point
  • 2:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. -- Education Session: Case-based Review of Ultrasound

Saturday, December 5

  • 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. -- Education Session: Case-based Review of Ultrasound

All events are listed in Central time.

Quantitative U S and Lung Health

By MedImaging International staff writers
Posted on 26 Oct 2020
A new ultrasound technique can quantify lung scarring and pulmonary edema (PE), providing a more affordable option than computerized tomography (CT).

Developed by researchers at the University of North Carolina (UNC; Chapel Hill, USA) and North Carolina State University (NCSU; Raleigh, USA), the innovative lung assessment method uses ultrasound transducer data to map the micro-architecture of lung parenchyma. A smart computational model extrapolates the multiple scattering echoes of the ultrasound waves to calculate the density of healthy alveoli in the lungs, and in turn offer a quantitative assessment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) tissue in the lungs, as well as PE levels.

Image: Assessing the lungs with ultrasound could help quantify pulmonary edema (Photo courtesy of Getty Images)
Image: Assessing the lungs with ultrasound could help quantify pulmonary edema (Photo courtesy of Getty Images)

In order to verify the hypothesis that in a fibrotic lung, the thickening of the alveolar wall reduces the amount of air, thus minimizing scattering events, the researchers induced IPF in Sprague-Dawley rats by instilling bleomycin into the airway. After three weeks, a 128-element linear array transducer operating at 7.8 MHz was used to evaluate mean free path level and backscatter frequency shift (BFS). The results showed significant differences between control and fibrotic rats in both values. The study was published on October 15, 2020, in IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

“Automated quantitative assessment would allow the technology to be used by personnel with minimal training, and would allow healthcare providers to compare data across time. Caregivers would be able to tell if a patient’s edema is getting better or worse,” said co-senior author Marie Muller, PhD, of NCSU. “Being able to monitor pulmonary edema in patients with heart failure would also be very useful. This is often done by assessing fluctuations in a patient’s body weight in order to estimate how much fluid has collected in the patient’s lungs, which is not as specific as we’d like it to be.”

The speed at which sound waves propagate within tissue is determined by the density and stiffness of the tissue, rather than by characteristics of the sound waves themselves, and is inversely proportional to tissue density and directly proportional to stiffness of the tissue; i.e., the denser the tissue, the slower the propagation velocity, while the stiffer the tissue, the higher the velocity. Propagation speed is slowest through air and fat, and fastest through muscle and bone. Ultrasound propagation in a highly scattering regime follows a diffusion process.

Related Links:
University of North Carolina
North Carolina State University