Tổng số lượt xem trang
Thứ Hai, 14 tháng 4, 2014
Anal and Rectal Endosonography in Clinical Practice
Anal (EcoA) and rectal endosonography (EcoEAR) is a useful test in the evaluation of patients with anorectal pathology. However, there is no clear consensus on its indications.
The aim of this study was to determine the opinion of clinicians regarding the current indications and usefulness of this diagnostic test in daily clinical practice.
A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a survey sent to the services of General surgery in a specific area of Spain.
The clinical usefulness of the test was evaluated using an analog scale from 0 (lowest value) to 10 (maximum utility) for each pathology. Of the 47 hospitals, 23 responded to the questionnaire (48.9%). The average number of ultrasounds performed in these centers was 217 per year (standard deviation: 140.1, range 73–450) during the last 3 years.
The most common indications for this test were: rectal tumor (85%), anal fistula (80%), and fecal incontinence (70%). This test was suggested more, depending on availability in the hospital itself. In conclusion, anal and rectal endosonography remains a very useful diagnostic clinical test in the opinion of clinicians in general and digestive surgery, especially in the evaluation of patients with anal fistula, fecal incontinence, or rectal tumors.
Thứ Sáu, 11 tháng 4, 2014
PULMONARY EDEMA and ULTRASOUND
Ultrasound Can identify Pregnant Woman with Preeclampsia at Risk for Respiratory Failure
By Medimaging International staff writers
Posted on 31 Mar 2014
Image: Ultrasound image of a lung (Photo courtesy of JP Rathmell).
Ultrasound imaging of the lungs could help clinicians rapidly determine if a pregnant woman with preeclampsia is at risk for respiratory failure.
The study’s findings were published in the April 2014 issue of the journal Anesthesiology. About 60,000 women worldwide die as a result of preeclampsia, which causes severely high blood pressure. Potential complications include stroke, bleeding and excess fluid in the lungs—called pulmonary edema—which can lead to respiratory failure. The study suggests that taking a lung ultrasound can help physicians easily determine whether a woman with preeclampsia is suffering from pulmonary edema and ensure she receives the appropriate treatment.
“Lung ultrasound is fast, safe, noninvasive, and easy to use,” said Marc Leone, MD, PhD, lead author of the study and vice chair of the department of anesthesiology and critical care medicine, Hopital Nord-Marseille (France). “We found it allowed us to quickly assess whether a woman with preeclampsia had pulmonary edema and confirm the severity of the condition.”
Clinicians frequently gauge urine output to determine if a woman needs fluid administration, but the results are wrong about half of the time. “Lung ultrasound enables the medical team to identify which women really need the fluid treatment,” noted Dr. Zieleskiewicz, the study's first author.
Pulmonary edema is typically caused by heart failure, but also can be caused by lung inflammation. Researchers analyzed the use of lung ultrasound imaging, which can evaluate lung edema, is easier to use than cardiac ultrasound, and can be performed with technology typically found in maternity wards. Lung ultrasound highlights white lines mimicking comet tails, irradiating from the border of the lungs. These lines represent water in the lungs. The detection of three or more lines strongly suggests the diagnosis of pulmonary edema.
Researchers performed both cardiac and lung ultrasound scans before and after delivery in 20 women with severe preeclampsia. Five of the 20 women (25%) had pulmonary edema prior to delivery according to lung ultrasound findings, whereas 4 (20%) had the disorder according to the cardiac ultrasound. The lung ultrasound identified a patient with noncardiac pulmonary edema, which the cardiac ultrasound did not detect.
These findings, according to the researchers, could help safeguard that pregnant women with pulmonary edema not be given intravenous or excess fluids, which worsens the disorder and can lead to respiratory failure. Typically, women with pulmonary edema are treated with oxygen and drugs to lower the blood pressure or rid the body of excess fluid. In real time, lung ultrasound scanning also serves to observe improvement or worsening of pulmonary edema.
By Medimaging International staff writers
Posted on 31 Mar 2014
Image: Ultrasound image of a lung (Photo courtesy of JP Rathmell).
Ultrasound imaging of the lungs could help clinicians rapidly determine if a pregnant woman with preeclampsia is at risk for respiratory failure.
The study’s findings were published in the April 2014 issue of the journal Anesthesiology. About 60,000 women worldwide die as a result of preeclampsia, which causes severely high blood pressure. Potential complications include stroke, bleeding and excess fluid in the lungs—called pulmonary edema—which can lead to respiratory failure. The study suggests that taking a lung ultrasound can help physicians easily determine whether a woman with preeclampsia is suffering from pulmonary edema and ensure she receives the appropriate treatment.
“Lung ultrasound is fast, safe, noninvasive, and easy to use,” said Marc Leone, MD, PhD, lead author of the study and vice chair of the department of anesthesiology and critical care medicine, Hopital Nord-Marseille (France). “We found it allowed us to quickly assess whether a woman with preeclampsia had pulmonary edema and confirm the severity of the condition.”
Clinicians frequently gauge urine output to determine if a woman needs fluid administration, but the results are wrong about half of the time. “Lung ultrasound enables the medical team to identify which women really need the fluid treatment,” noted Dr. Zieleskiewicz, the study's first author.
Pulmonary edema is typically caused by heart failure, but also can be caused by lung inflammation. Researchers analyzed the use of lung ultrasound imaging, which can evaluate lung edema, is easier to use than cardiac ultrasound, and can be performed with technology typically found in maternity wards. Lung ultrasound highlights white lines mimicking comet tails, irradiating from the border of the lungs. These lines represent water in the lungs. The detection of three or more lines strongly suggests the diagnosis of pulmonary edema.
Researchers performed both cardiac and lung ultrasound scans before and after delivery in 20 women with severe preeclampsia. Five of the 20 women (25%) had pulmonary edema prior to delivery according to lung ultrasound findings, whereas 4 (20%) had the disorder according to the cardiac ultrasound. The lung ultrasound identified a patient with noncardiac pulmonary edema, which the cardiac ultrasound did not detect.
These findings, according to the researchers, could help safeguard that pregnant women with pulmonary edema not be given intravenous or excess fluids, which worsens the disorder and can lead to respiratory failure. Typically, women with pulmonary edema are treated with oxygen and drugs to lower the blood pressure or rid the body of excess fluid. In real time, lung ultrasound scanning also serves to observe improvement or worsening of pulmonary edema.
Thứ Năm, 10 tháng 4, 2014
NHÂN CA DỊ DẠNG MẠCH MÁU GAN @ MEDIC
Thảo luận
Tĩnh mạch trên gan P thường là mạch máu duy nhất dẫn lưu cho thùy phải của gan; Tuy nhiên, có thể có biến thể vào khoảng 18% tổng số dân. Như một quy luật chung,nhánh tīnh mạch gan
P dưới [inferior right hepatic
vein ] dẫn lưu phân thuỳ VI và nhu mô gan liền kề, và
đổ trực tiếp vào ngay sau P tĩnh mạch chủ dưới , 3-5 cm xa tĩnh mạch trên gan P (2). Nhánh dưới tĩnh mạch gan P có thể lớn hơn tĩnh mạch trên gan P.
Trong trường hợp
hiện có, chúng tôi bất ngờ tìm thấy một
aneurysmal portosystemic thông nối giữa nhánh P tĩnh mạch cửa và nhánh dưới tĩnh mạch trên gan P , đại diện cho portosystemic shunt type 3 theo phân loại của Park et al. (1). Tĩnh mạch gan P cũng thông nối với cấu tạo này.
Shunt tĩnh mạch cửa chủ trong gan [intrahepatic portosystemic] là tình trạng bẩm sinh hoặc mắc phải bao gồm một giao tiếp giữa hệ cửa và hệ tĩnh mạch hệ
thống chủ, nằm ở trong gan
ít nhất một phần(3). Shunts mắc phải do là tuần hoàn bên thứ cấp trong gan cho cao áp TM cửa và xơ gan (4), hoặc do chấn thương, làm sinh thiết gan hoặc phẫu thuật.
Shunt tĩnh mạch cửa chủ trong gan bẩm sinh là một tình trạng ít phổ biến được hiểu rõ trong bối cảnh phát
triển phôi thai của các hệ thống tĩnh mạch cửa và hệ trên gan. Vào tuần thứ tư của cuộc sống thai nhi, các hệ thống vitelline và rốn bắt
đầu tan rã thành xoang gan [intrahepatic sinusoids] làm tăng tương ứng lần lượt TM cửa trong gan và tĩnh mạch trên gan.
Shunts cửa chủ bẩm sinh là đại diện cho thông nối tĩnh mạch tồn
lưu (3, 5). Chẩn đoán
sớm và đánh giá định kỳ các shunt là quan trọng bởi vì nguy cơ liên tục của bệnh não gan với tiếp xúc với phơi
nhiễm amoniac, đặc
biệt là nếu các shunt tiến triển (6, 7). Ngoài ra, giảm lưu
lượng máu đến gan có thể dẫn đến thoái hóa mỡ, rối loạn chức năng gan, và
teo gan (8).
Siêu âm Doppler màu là phương tiện tạo hình chính để chẩn đoán của shunts
portosystemic tĩnh mạch. Ngoài việc chứng tỏ dòng chảy tín hiệu giữa các mạch
tham gia, và đánh giá hướng dòng chảy, nó có thể xác định tỷ lệ shunt bởi ước
tính thể tích dòng chảy (6, 7). Tăng cường
độ tương phản CT với xử lý kỹ thuật hình ảnh ba chiều thường được thực hiện để
bổ sung cho siêu âm, đặc biệt ở những bệnh nhân
béo phì hoặc ở những bệnh nhân với teo gan nặng (6).
CT multiplanar hình ảnh tạo bởi ba chiều hình ảnh xử lý kỹ thuật có hiệu
quả hơn so với các hình ảnh hai chiều trong việc chứng minh biến thể nhỏ và mạch
cong. Với việc sử dụng rộng rãi các kỹ thuật mạch shunt như những có thể lân
khéo quan sát bằng phương thức hình ảnh khác có thể được công nhận phổ biến
hơn.
Discussion
The right hepatic vein is usually a single vessel that
drains the right lobe of the liver; however, there may be a variant inferior
right hepatic vein in about 18% of the population. As a general rule, the
inferior Right hepatic vein drains segment VI and adjacent hepatic parenchyma,
and flows directly into the right posterior aspect of the inferior vena cava, 3
to 5 cm distal to the right hepatic vein (2). The inferior right
hepatic vein may be larger than the right hepatic vein. In the present case, we
found incidentally an aneurysmal portosystemic communication between the right portal vein and the inferior
right hepatic vein, which may represent a type 3 portosystemic shunt according
to the classification of Park et al. (1). The right hepatic vein was also
connected to this formation.
Intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt is a congenital or
acquired condition consisting of a communication between the portal and
systemic venous circulation, situated at least partially within the liver (3).
Acquired shunts may develop as intrahepatic collateral pathways secondary to
portal hypertension and cirrhosis (4), or may result from trauma, liver biopsy,
or surgery.
Congenital intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt is an
uncommon condition that is best understood in the context of the embryological
development of the portal and hepatic venous systems. By the fourth week of
fetal life, the vitelline and umbilical systems begin to break into intrahepatic
sinusoids that give rise to the intrahepatic portal and hepatic veins,
respectively.
Congenital portal-systemic shunts are thought to represent
persistent venous communications (3, 5). Early diagnosis and periodic
evaluation of the shunt are important because of the ongoing risk of hepatic
encephalopathy with exposure to high ammonia levels, especially if the shunt
may be progressive (6, 7). Additionally, reduction in blood flow to the liver
may result in fatty degeneration, hepatic dysfunction, and atrophy of the liver
(8).
Color Doppler US is recommended as the primary imaging
modality for diagnosis of portosystemic venous shunts. In addition to
demonstrating flow signals between the involved vessels, and evaluating flow
direction, it may also determine the shunt ratio by estimating flow volume (6,
7). Contrast-enhanced CT with three-dimensional image processing techniques is usually
performed to supplement US, especially in obese patients or in patients with
marked liver atrophy (6).
Thứ Tư, 9 tháng 4, 2014
ULTRASOUND FAST for BREAST IMPLANT STATUS
Ultrasound Fast Alternative to MRI for Breast Implant Status
Pam Harrison
April 01, 2014
LAS VEGAS — High-resolution ultrasound done in a physician's office is a fast, convenient, and friendly alternative to MRI for ascertaining the status of breast implants, a pilot study suggests.
Researchers found a "higher than expected" rotation rate in 2 types of shaped cohesive gel implants and detected 2 ruptures that were later confirmed on MRI.
Dr. William Adams Jr.
"Clinically, our rotation rate is only about 2%. It was surprising that we were definitely able to show with ultrasound that the rotation rate was much higher," said William Adams Jr., MD, clinical associate professor of plastic surgery at the University of Texas South Western Medical Center in Dallas.
"This means that a fair number of rotations are going unnoticed by patients. We haven't had this type of information about shaped implants before, so it's something we can add to our discussion with patients when they are considering these types of surgeries," he told Medscape Medical News.
The study results were presented here at the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) 2014 Annual Convention in Las Vegas, Nevada.
MRI Screening
Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends that breast implant recipients undergo MRI screening 3 years after implantation and every other year thereafter to determine whether an implant has ruptured. However, even in the best studies, there is at least a 15% false-positive rate, Dr. Adams noted.
This means that a woman might be rescheduled for breast implantation surgery only to have the surgeon discover the implant was intact.
In addition, "MRIs aren't much fun for the patient; they're loud, the patient has to lie still for a long time, and they are very expensive," said Dr. Adams.
Because of this, very few women ever go for an MRI, especially when their implants seem to be fine, he said.
In fact, rotation is not an issue with round breast implants; orientation is an issue only for implants that resemble the natural shape of the breast, where rotation could result in a misshapen breast. Rotational status cannot be determined with MRI.
The researchers evaluated 74 patients with bilateral shaped cohesive gel implants using ultrasound. Of the implants in this cohort, 48 were Allergan 410 and 100 were Mentor CPG.
Both types of implants have a textured outer shell and untextured fiducial markers on their surface at the lower pole, which allow the surgeon to feel and assess implant orientation during surgery, the researchers report. It was previously assumed that textured implants become anchored to the surrounding tissue and do not rotate.
The fiducial markers were imaged using a Terason 2000+ ultrasound system with a TouchView linear array probes.
The ultrasound examination itself is painless and nonthreatening, much like the fetal–maternal ultrasound screening many women are familiar with, Dr. Adams noted.
Marker orientation relative to the nipple was determined by using a clock-hand position, where 6 was directly downward and 3 directly to the right. Any orientation between 5 and 7 o'clock was considered to be "unrotated."
On ultrasound examination, which took place 6 months to 7 years after implantation, 25% of the Mentor CPG implants and 21% of the Allergan 410 implants had rotated from their original position.
"The vast majority of these rotations will 'self-reverse' and the implant will reorient itself over time, so it's somewhat of a dynamic process," said Dr. Adams.
"Still, my personal opinion is that ultrasound will eventually replace MRI. It just has to have FDA 'blessing' before surgeons can openly recommend it," he explained.
The percentage of women who follow the FDA recommendation and go for MRI screening is not known, said Brad Bengtson, MD, from the Bengtson Center for Aesthetics and Plastic Surgery in Grand Rapids, Michigan. However, he told Medscape Medical News that he would be "shocked" if it were over 3%.
Dr. Bengtson and his colleagues published the first landmark evaluation of high-resolution ultrasound for the detection of breast implant shell failure (Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32:157-174). They concluded that the ultrasound approach is equivalent to MRI in terms of visualization of implant rupture, but that its relative accessibility, affordability, and real-time visualization represent "significant potential advantages" over MRI for this indication.
"Since our original research began in 2012, we have imaged more than 500 patients and detected more than 80 patients with implant shell failure. And in every patient with a rupture who has gone to surgery, shell failure has been confirmed, with no false-positives to date," Dr. Bengtson reported. "Patients need a better solution than MRI to follow their breast implants over time; unquestionably, that technology is high-resolution ultrasound."
Pam Harrison
April 01, 2014
LAS VEGAS — High-resolution ultrasound done in a physician's office is a fast, convenient, and friendly alternative to MRI for ascertaining the status of breast implants, a pilot study suggests.
Researchers found a "higher than expected" rotation rate in 2 types of shaped cohesive gel implants and detected 2 ruptures that were later confirmed on MRI.
Dr. William Adams Jr.
"Clinically, our rotation rate is only about 2%. It was surprising that we were definitely able to show with ultrasound that the rotation rate was much higher," said William Adams Jr., MD, clinical associate professor of plastic surgery at the University of Texas South Western Medical Center in Dallas.
"This means that a fair number of rotations are going unnoticed by patients. We haven't had this type of information about shaped implants before, so it's something we can add to our discussion with patients when they are considering these types of surgeries," he told Medscape Medical News.
The study results were presented here at the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) 2014 Annual Convention in Las Vegas, Nevada.
MRI Screening
Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends that breast implant recipients undergo MRI screening 3 years after implantation and every other year thereafter to determine whether an implant has ruptured. However, even in the best studies, there is at least a 15% false-positive rate, Dr. Adams noted.
This means that a woman might be rescheduled for breast implantation surgery only to have the surgeon discover the implant was intact.
In addition, "MRIs aren't much fun for the patient; they're loud, the patient has to lie still for a long time, and they are very expensive," said Dr. Adams.
Because of this, very few women ever go for an MRI, especially when their implants seem to be fine, he said.
In fact, rotation is not an issue with round breast implants; orientation is an issue only for implants that resemble the natural shape of the breast, where rotation could result in a misshapen breast. Rotational status cannot be determined with MRI.
The researchers evaluated 74 patients with bilateral shaped cohesive gel implants using ultrasound. Of the implants in this cohort, 48 were Allergan 410 and 100 were Mentor CPG.
Both types of implants have a textured outer shell and untextured fiducial markers on their surface at the lower pole, which allow the surgeon to feel and assess implant orientation during surgery, the researchers report. It was previously assumed that textured implants become anchored to the surrounding tissue and do not rotate.
The fiducial markers were imaged using a Terason 2000+ ultrasound system with a TouchView linear array probes.
The ultrasound examination itself is painless and nonthreatening, much like the fetal–maternal ultrasound screening many women are familiar with, Dr. Adams noted.
Marker orientation relative to the nipple was determined by using a clock-hand position, where 6 was directly downward and 3 directly to the right. Any orientation between 5 and 7 o'clock was considered to be "unrotated."
On ultrasound examination, which took place 6 months to 7 years after implantation, 25% of the Mentor CPG implants and 21% of the Allergan 410 implants had rotated from their original position.
"The vast majority of these rotations will 'self-reverse' and the implant will reorient itself over time, so it's somewhat of a dynamic process," said Dr. Adams.
"Still, my personal opinion is that ultrasound will eventually replace MRI. It just has to have FDA 'blessing' before surgeons can openly recommend it," he explained.
The percentage of women who follow the FDA recommendation and go for MRI screening is not known, said Brad Bengtson, MD, from the Bengtson Center for Aesthetics and Plastic Surgery in Grand Rapids, Michigan. However, he told Medscape Medical News that he would be "shocked" if it were over 3%.
Dr. Bengtson and his colleagues published the first landmark evaluation of high-resolution ultrasound for the detection of breast implant shell failure (Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32:157-174). They concluded that the ultrasound approach is equivalent to MRI in terms of visualization of implant rupture, but that its relative accessibility, affordability, and real-time visualization represent "significant potential advantages" over MRI for this indication.
"Since our original research began in 2012, we have imaged more than 500 patients and detected more than 80 patients with implant shell failure. And in every patient with a rupture who has gone to surgery, shell failure has been confirmed, with no false-positives to date," Dr. Bengtson reported. "Patients need a better solution than MRI to follow their breast implants over time; unquestionably, that technology is high-resolution ultrasound."
Đăng ký:
Bài đăng
(
Atom
)