Tổng số lượt xem trang

Thứ Ba, 25 tháng 8, 2020

Carotid lumen size linked to death from all causes


By Theresa Pablos, AuntMinnie staff writer

August 21, 2020 -- Could ultrasound measurements of the carotid lumen diameter be a better measure than carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) for predicting mortality from cardiovascular disease? Lumen diameter indeed could add new information, according to a study in the Journal of the American Heart Association.



Researchers from Germany found that lumen diameter measurements of the carotid artery derived from ultrasound scans predicted mortality from both cardiovascular disease and from all causes. And they believe that it provides more information than CIMT.
CIMT has been used as a noninvasive biomarker for cardiovascular disease risk stratification and the risk of future cardiovascular events, the authors report. Both the coronary and carotid arteries distend during the early stages of atherosclerosis, a phenomenon that can be detected and measured on ultrasound scans.
But recent research has raised doubts about the reliability of CIMT for predicting individual outcomes. The new evidence, published on August 4, demonstrates that lumen size might be a better predictor of death from both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events, with larger lumens indicating higher risk.
"Our results suggest that [lumen diameter] may be superior to CIMT," wrote the authors, led by Dr. Felix Fritze from the University of Greifswald's medical school in Greifswald, Germany.
The team of German researchers compared the effectiveness of CIMT and lumen diameter using data from a prior study that conducted baseline screenings and 10- and 15-year follow-up exams on the population of a German village.
As part of the baseline assessment, individuals underwent carotid ultrasonography. The original research team also recorded relevant health information, including cholesterol levels, diabetes status, and mortality outcomes.
For the new analysis, Fritze and colleagues created various models to analyze data from 2,751 participants, including 506 who died during the original study. Their further cardiovascular mortality analysis used outcomes from all but 214 of the participants with unknown causes of death.
The researchers found that individuals with the largest CIMT measurements had the highest hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality, at 1.73, compared with a hazard ratio for lumen diameter of 1.29 and the combination of CIMT and lumen diameter at 1.26.
The model using lumen diameter alone was significantly associated with death from all causes, deaths attributed to cardiovascular events, and deaths attributed to noncardiovascular events. On the other hand, the model using CIMT alone was significantly associated with all-cause mortality and noncardiovascular mortality -- but not cardiovascular mortality.
To help determine the likelihood of their models predicting future values, the authors conducted an Akaike information criterion (AIC) analysis. In this analysis, the lumen diameter model came out on top for both all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. It also came in second for cardiovascular mortality, just behind a model that combined lumen size and CIMT values.
Furthermore, the lumen diameter model remained significant for all-cause mortality even after the researchers excluded people with chronic kidney disease, prior myocardial infarction, and type 2 diabetes. The same wasn't true for the CIMT model.
Lumen diameter vs. CIMT for predicting mortality
ModelRank (AIC)
All-cause mortalityCardiovascular mortalityNoncardiovascular mortality
Lumen diameterNo. 1No. 1No. 2
Lumen diameter + CIMTNo. 2No. 2No. 1
CIMTNo. 3No. 5No. 3
NoneNo. 4No. 4No. 4
Lumen diameter ÷ CIMTNo. 5No. 3No. 5
The authors do not know why the model using lumen diameter performed much better than CIMT in their analysis. They hypothesized it could be because lumen size is related to CIMT but is also much easier to measure.
"The larger caliber of [lumen diameter] compared with CIMT may improve manual measurement accuracy and thus may be more applicable for an outpatient setting," they wrote.
It's important to note the study only included white participants from one part of Germany, so the results may not be applicable to a more diverse population. As a result, the authors called for follow-up research with more robust patient populations to verify their findings.
"To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the informative value of CIMT and [lumen diameter] with regard to all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality associations," they concluded. "We report that [lumen diameter] provides more information than CIMT."

Thứ Hai, 24 tháng 8, 2020

US effective for working up masses found on DBT


By Kate Madden Yee, AuntMinnie.com staff writer

August 24, 2020 -- Ultrasound appears to be an effective and safe diagnostic workup modality when it comes to evaluating masses identified on screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), according to research published in the European Journal of Radiology (EJR).

The findings suggest that, at least in the case of breast masses, it may not be necessary for women to undergo both digital mammography and ultrasound after screening DBT -- which has the benefit of reducing radiation exposure, wrote a group led by Dr. Jessica Porembka of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
"DBT has been shown to be superior to conventional views in the diagnostic setting ... [and] women who already underwent screening DBT may be receiving unnecessary digital mammography prior to ultrasound imaging," the group wrote in an EJR article posted on August 5. "This potentially adds unnecessary complexity, cost, and radiation exposure, as well as prolonged diagnostic workup times without adding significant value."
Screening DBT reduces recalls compared with digital mammography alone, but still, sometimes follow-up is needed. Porembka and colleagues investigated whether in some of these cases --perhaps by type of lesion found on DBT -- women could undergo ultrasound alone rather than also having additional mammography.
The study included 266 noncalcified lesions in 247 women detected on screening DBT between January 2014 and December 2016. The lesions ranged from architectural distortions and asymmetries to focal asymmetries and masses. The investigators assessed the number and type of lesions that underwent diagnostic follow-up only with ultrasound.
The researchers found that ultrasound alone was used in 69% of workups of recalled masses, and that the odds of masses being worked up with ultrasound alone was eight times that of the odds of digital mammography and ultrasound being used. The authors also found that "ultrasound alone in the diagnostic evaluation of a mass seen on screening DBT had a higher yield of true lesions than masses worked up with digital mammography/ultrasound," confirming that "masses seen on screening DBT can be adequately evaluated with ultrasound alone."
However, ultrasound alone did less well with architectural distortions and focal asymmetries, with a detection rate of 44% and 25%, respectively, Porembka and colleagues cautioned.
"Our findings suggest that a combination of both [digital mammography and ultrasound] was preferred by radiologists in the work up of architectural distortions given the differential diagnosis of radial scar versus malignancy," the team noted. "For focal asymmetries, 68% were evaluated with digital mammography/ultrasound, while only 25% were evaluated with ultrasound alone, indicating that a combination of digital mammography/ultrasound is likely warranted in the work up of focal asymmetry on DBT."
In any case, the study results are good news for women undergoing diagnostic follow-up for masses found on screening DBT, according to the researchers.
"The implication of our findings is that we can save women unnecessary radiation and unnecessary cost of digital mammography by utilizing ultrasound alone in the evaluation of recalled masses," they concluded.

Thứ Sáu, 21 tháng 8, 2020

Transcranial U S helps solve COVID-19 mystery


By Theresa Pablos, AuntMinnie staff writer

August 21, 2020 -- Ultrasound scans with a robotic transcranial Doppler device provided a clue into why patients with COVID-19 experience severe hypoxemia without lung stiffness. In a serendipitous discovery, researchers linked the ultrasound findings to suspiciously low oxygen levels in patients with severe cases of COVID-19.


The researchers used a robotic transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound system to assess cerebral blood flow in 18 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. They had been looking for stroke and other cranial abnormalities, but they instead found that the majority of patients had detectable microbubbles, a finding that indicates abnormally dilated pulmonary blood vessels.
"This study helps explain the strange phenomenon seen in some COVID-19 patients known as 'happy hypoxia,' where oxygen levels are very low, but the patients do not appear to be in respiratory distress," stated senior author Dr. Hooman Poor, an assistant professor at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in a press release. Poor and colleagues published their research on August 6 as a letter in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.
In patients with classic acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary inflammation results in blood vessel changes that make the lungs stiff and impair oxygenation. But the amount of hypoxemia seen in patients with COVID-19 is often drastically out of proportion with lung stiffness.
The new pilot study revealed that vasodilation could help explain why COVID-19 pneumonia differs from classic ARDS. Using transcranial Doppler ultrasound scans, the researchers found that 83% of patients had detectable microbubbles. In addition, the number of microbubbles correlated with hypoxemia severity in patients with severe COVID-19.
In comparison, only about 26% of patients with classic ARDS show detectable microbubbles on transcranial Doppler scans. The number of microbubbles also did not correlate with hypoxemia severity for patients with classic ARDS.
"It is becoming more evident that the virus wreaks havoc on the pulmonary vasculature in a variety of ways," stated Poor.
The study included 18 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia who also had altered mental status and required mechanical ventilation. The patients underwent robotic transcranial Doppler ultrasound (Lucid Robotic System by NovaSignal) with an agitated saline solution.
The researchers injected the contrast agent in an upper extremity or through a central line in the internal jugular vein. NovaSignal's ultrasound software automatically counted the number of microbubbles detected over 20 seconds, and the researchers manually counted and confirmed the number of microbubbles as a precaution.
In healthy patients, the contrast microbubbles enter the lung blood vessels and get filtered out by pulmonary capillaries. If bubbles are detected in the brain, it indicates that the patient either has a hole in the heart or that the capillaries are abnormally dilated, which the researchers believe might be contributing to hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19.
Poor and his team at Mount Sinai are continuing their research and have thus far collected data from roughly 80 patients with various COVID-19 severity. The team plans to analyze microbubble transit, including how transit varies throughout the course of the disease.
"If these findings are confirmed in larger studies, pulmonary microbubble transit may potentially serve as a marker of disease severity or even a surrogate endpoint in therapeutic trials for COVID-19 pneumonia," Poor stated. "Future studies that investigate the use of pulmonary vascular constrictors in this patient population may be warranted."

Thứ Tư, 19 tháng 8, 2020

Doppler U S helps assess cervical cancer stage


By Theresa Pablos, AuntMinnie staff writer

August 18, 2020 -- Researchers in China found a link between findings on Doppler ultrasound scans and characteristics of cervical cancer. Blood flow seen through color ultrasound was tied to tumor clinical stage, cancer type, and pathology in a study published on August 10 in PLOS One.

Imaging to assist with cancer staging is crucial, and there have been calls to include more radiological imaging in cervical cancer diagnosis and staging. The new findings suggest Adler grades -- a scoring system that reflects tumor vascularization -- may help physicians assess cervical cancers using color ultrasound.
"Adler grades are closely associated with the clinical pathology of cervical cancer, which may be a convenient and effective approach for the assisting assessment of cervical cancer," wrote the authors, led by Dr. Dehong Che from the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University in Harbin, China.
Prior research found that color Doppler ultrasound scans may accurately determine tumor size, invasiveness, and vascular patterns. But while Doppler ultrasound is used in the assessment of other cancers, it is not as common for gynecological cancer assessment, the authors noted.
To determine the effectiveness of Doppler ultrasound on cervical cancer assessment, the authors enrolled 162 patients in their study. The patients had pathologically confirmed cervical cancer cases and no prior history of malignancy, cervical surgery, or uterine malformations.
A sonographer first performed a grayscale sonography examination to evaluate the cervical area and surrounding tissue before studying blood flow with Doppler ultrasound. A radiologist and a gynecologist determined an Adler grade for the tumor based on the blood flow to the lesion.
Adler score and ultrasound findings on cervical cancer tumors
Adler scoreDefinitionUltrasound findings
Grade 0No obvious blood flow• Normal appearance
Grade 11-2 blood vessels with a diameter of < 1 mm• Slightly thickened morphology
• More enhanced intra-cervical echo
• Spot-like blood flow signals
Grade 23-4 blood vessels with a diameter of < 1 mm• Uneven or thickened cervical echo
• Strip blood flow
Grade 3More than 4 blood vessels or vessels are intertwined into a network• Parauterine and extrauterine invasion
• Reticular blood flow

Doppler ultrasound images of cervical cancers with different Adler scores: (A) Grade 0, (B) Grade 1, (C) Grade 2, and (D) Grade 3.
Click image to enlarge.
Doppler ultrasound images of cervical cancers with different Adler scores: (A) Grade 0, (B) Grade 1, (C) Grade 2, and (D) Grade 3. Images courtesy of Che D, Yang Z, Wei H, Wang X, Gao J (2020) The Adler grade by Doppler ultrasound is associated with clinical pathology of cervical cancer: Implication for clinical management. PLOS ONE, 15(8): e0236725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236725.
Patients with a higher Adler score had higher clinical stages of cervical cancer, the authors found. Adler score was significantly associated with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical stage, pathological tumor type, and squamous cell carcinoma subtypes.
radiology graph
Compared with FIGO stages, Adler grade achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.811, with a sensitivity of 55% and specificity 90%. Compared with pathological stage results, Adler grade achieved an AUC of 0.76, with a sensitivity of 52% and specificity of 88%.
"Those results indicated that Adler grade could provide valuable reference for the diagnosis of cervical cancer," the authors wrote.
Cervical cancer is known for its rapid proliferation and active cell division -- two characteristics related to blood vessel proliferation. As a result, this type of cancer may translate particularly well to Doppler imaging, the authors noted.
"On color Doppler ultrasound images, there are often abundant different types of blood flow signals in tumor tissues, which correspond to its rich vascular network and are related to the special structure and blood flow characteristics of tumor blood vessels," they wrote.
The authors cautioned their study had a small sample size and that subjective factors can influence the Adler score. Nevertheless, they concluded that the use of Doppler ultrasound should be considered when working with patients with suspected or newly diagnosed cervical cancer.
"With the continuous development of ultrasound technology and population of clinical ultrasound applications, Adler grade should be promoted in the application of color Doppler ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer," the authors wrote.

Thứ Sáu, 7 tháng 8, 2020

Abdominal POCUS in Critical Care




The secrets of the abdomen

Overview of abdominal point-of-care ultrasound use in the ICU, potential diagnoses and findings common to the critical care patient population.

The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in critical care as a diagnostic and monitoring tool is rapidly expanding. While its role in cardiovascular and respiratory assessment is well established (within critical care), abdominal ultrasonography is less so; perhaps because of the myriad of potential diagnoses that can be made and the fact that the abdomen is often less accessible due to gaseous interposition. Regardless of modality, the key difference between radiology department scans and scans performed by intensivists is that the latter are more focused and aim to answer a specific clinical question in the context of a specific clinical situation.
It is without the scope of this article to describe every single (potential) use of abdominal POCUS; the aim is to provide an overview of the potential diagnosis and findings common to the critical care patient population.

Basic B-mode ultrasound

1. Trauma


One of the earliest uses of ultrasound (US) outside of radiology was in the detection of intra-abdominal free fluid (or blood) in the context of trauma. The Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) scan has been consistently included as part of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course over the latest editions (Royal College of Surgeons 2017). The original FAST scan included assessment of the hepato-renal recess (right upper quadrant a.k.a Morison’s pouch), the spleno-renal recess (left upper quadrant) and the pelvis for the presence of free fluid/blood (Carroll et al. n.d.).This has been expanded to include the subcostal views (pericardial fluid/tamponade), anterior thoracic views (to rule out pneumothorax) and the detection of pleural fluid in the so-called extended FAST or eFAST (123sonography.com n.d.) (Figure 1).

The sensitivity and specificity of FAST for the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid were 64–98% and 86–100%, respectively (Bloom and Gibbons 2018). This range may be explained by differences in the levels of clinical experience and in the reference standards.

2. Abdominal free fluid


Ultrasound allows for the identification of free fluid, quantification of the volume and potentially, the underlying aetiology.

The differential diagnosis of the presence of abdominal free fluid is summarised in Table 1. In the critically ill the main cause for abdominal fluid is in the setting of sepsis, capillary leak and massive fluid resuscitation, as seen in severely burned patients. The aetiology of spontaneous haemoperitoneum can vary, and the causes may be classified as gynaecologic, hepatic, splenic, vascular, or coagulopathic conditions.

US is not sensitive at identifying a focus of extravasation from a vessel or organ (Schmidt et al. 205). Therefore, FAST may be an option for the initial evaluation of a patient to detect haemoperitoneum in non-trauma patients, but it does not replace computed tomography (CT) scanning.

3. Assessment of gastric content


Dysfunctional gastric emptying in critically ill patients can contribute to complications during procedures related to airway management and can result in unsuccessful enteral feeding as well as an increased risk of aspiration (Marik 2001). A 6-hour fasting period (2 hours for clear fluid) has been recommended for patients undergoing elective surgery to reduce the risk of aspiration during anaesthesia (s.n. 2017). In the ICU, gastric emptying is frequently altered and influenced by several factors, including age, diagnosis on admission (Hsu et al. 2011) underlying disease processes (e.g. diabetes, porphyria, shock)(Nguyen et al. 2007), therapeutic interventions (e.g. mechanical ventilation), medications (e.g. opioids, sedatives, neuromuscular blockers, vasopressors) (Nimmo et al. 1975; Steyn et al. 1997), electrolyte and metabolic disturbances and mechanical ventilation (Mutlu et al. 2001).

Epidural anaesthesia, on the contrary, improves gastric emptying and peristalsis. The measure of the antral cross-sectional area (CSA) by US is feasible in most critically ill patients and would allow for direct visualisation of stomach content. On average, a CSA > 15-25 cm2 corresponds to a gastric residual volume (GRV) > 300 mL. The same principle has been studied with regard to assessment of preoperative fasting status amongst surgical patients (Van der Putte and Perlas 2014; Perlas et al. 2009).

Gastric US can also identify other pathologies such as gastric tumours (carcinomas and rarely teratomas), hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and even bezoar related to enteral nutrition.

Normal stomach wall anatomy consists of five layers, referred to as the gut signature:
  1. Serosa (hyperechogenic)
  2. Muscularis propria (hypoechogenic)
  3. Submucosa (hyperechogenic)
  4. Muscularis mucosa (hypoechogenic)
  5. Mucosa (hyperechogenic)

4. Bowel obstruction


Features of the bowel which can be assessed using US include:
  • Wall thickness
  • Diameter and intraluminal contents
  • Peristalsis
  • Vascularity

The diameter of the bowel and its contents may vary according to site, fasting/feeding state and bowel function. In adults, the normal small bowel measures under 30mm in diameter and the normal large bowel under 60 mm in diameter (Reintam Blaser et al. 2012). Dilated loops may show thickened walls (normally up to 3 mm in the small bowel), or thickened valvulae conniventes (normally up to 2mm in the large bowel). The exceptions to this are the duodenal bulb and rectum, which are less than 3 and 4mm in thickness respectively (Lichtenstein et al. 2014).Ultrasound patterns can aid in the differentiation of small from large bowel (Table 2).


Assessment of bowel peristalsis is difficult and subjective, but may provide useful information in several intestinal diseases. Increased small bowel peristalsis has been described in coeliac disease and acute mechanical bowel obstruction (increased to-and-fro motion of the bowel contents) (Hefny et al. 2012). In later phases, one may detect a fluid-filled lumen, thinning and spasm of the bowel wall, evidence of extraluminal fluid and decreased or absent peristalsis.

Types of peristalsis:
  • Absent peristalsis
  • Present ineffective peristalsis
  • Present effective peristalsis
  • Augmented peristalsis

5. Viscus perforation


Physiologic air can be seen in the lumen of the bowel as small stars. Larger air bubbles can appear as hyperechoic stripes generating comet tail artefacts (these are rare in the small bowel but frequent in the large bowel), much like a linear view of the lung would look. Air artefacts can emanate from the thoracic cavity and the lung over the liver. Pathological air, however, may produce an enhanced peritoneal stripe sign (EPSS), reverberation artefacts and ring-down artefacts (Figures 2a and 2b) (Hoffmann et al. 2012).

6. Renal dysfunction


International guidelines recommend that all patients who present in acute renal failure undergo an ultrasound examination to ascertain its cause (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2012). Hydronephrosis due to obstructive uropathy is a reasonably straightforward diagnosis to make.
More advanced techniques include the assessment of blood flow within the renal artery and vein using Doppler analysis.

Analysis of the urinary bladder should be performed as well. The bladder can be empty, filled or distended (globus). The position of the bladder catheter balloon can be checked, as well as the presence of hyperechogenic structures (debris, tumour, blood clot etc).

7. Liver and spleen 


Ultrasound of the liver is divided into general US views including anatomic views of the liver, gallbladder and biliary tree. Pathology within these organs e.g. acute liver failure, can result in intensive care admission, but is beyond the scope of this paper.

Advanced modalities

1. Doppler and colour Doppler techniques


Doppler US is used to assess the signal from visceral vessels that supply the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and smaller vessels within the intestinal wall. Although the technique cannot be used to assess capillary flow, it can be used to analyse all the major visceral vessels e.g. renal, hepatic, mesenteric. It has to be noted that normal bowel wall perfusion cannot be demonstrated by colour or power Doppler. The presence of flow in the bowel wall points towards pathologic perfusion (e.g. hyperaemia in actively inflamed segments, as seen in appendicitis).
Commonly used measurements which can be performed include:
  • Systolic, diastolic and mean velocities
  • Pulsatility index
  • Resistance index (peak systolic velocity – end diastolic velocity)/peak systolic velocity
  • Blood flow volume

GI tract blood flow


Colour Doppler allows for the assessment of mural flow, the absence of which is a sign of ischaemia. Unfortunately, this finding is only reported in 20–50% of patients with a proven diagnosis of ischaemic colitis (Danse et al. 2000a; Danse et al. 2000b). Doppler US can show stenosis, emboli, and thrombosis in the near visible parts of the coeliac trunk, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). In the early phase of bowel ischaemia, US examinations may show SMA occlusion, hyperaemic segments and bowel spasm. Collateral vessels cannot be reliably displayed using ultrasound. Systolic velocities of more than 250–300 cm/s are sensitive indicators of severe mesenteric arterial stenosis (Hamada et al. 2014; Koenig et al. 2011). The spectral analysis of Doppler signals of arteries supplying the GI tract (truncus coeliacus, superior and inferior mesenteric arteries) and the vessels draining the intestine, can be used to estimate bowel perfusion (see below). Assessment in transverse and longitudinal plane should be performed. Low flow states can also be identified by the presence of spontaneous contrast and turbulent flow in the large vessels.

Hepatic blood flow


Portal vein: the normal main portal vein (MPV) is gently undulating with peak systolic velocities ranging between 20 cm/s and 40 cm/s. A low flow velocity of <16 cm/s in addition to a calibre increase in the MPV are diagnostic features of portal hypertension (PH). Further worsening of PH leads to a to-and-fro flow pattern, whereby the nearly stagnant blood column in the portal veins is seen to shift into and out of the liver with the respiratory cycle. In the end stages, stagnation of the blood column can lead to thrombosis or progress to a frank flow reversal or non-forward portal flow (NFPF). This is considered to have grave prognostic significance, indicating severe and irreversible liver failure (Wachsberg et al. 2002).

Hepatic vein: the normal flow is triphasic with two hepatofugal phases related to atrial and ventricular diastole. Fibrotic or inflammatory changes may create a monophasic flow pattern. Early waveform changes in cirrhosis patients include spectral broadening and dampening of the normal, retrograde, pre-systolic wave of the hepatic vein waveform. Later, the normal triphasic waveform pattern may be diminished or replaced with a monophasic pattern. Therefore the monophasic hepatic vein waveform indicates relatively high portal pressures (Ralls 1990).
Hepatic artery: hepatic arterial resistance changes with increasing portal pressure values, but hepatic arterial resistive indices correlate poorly with the severity of cirrhosis and will not be further discussed here.

Renal blood flow


Doppler US can be used to assess renal perfusion. Normal resistive index (RI) is approximately 0.58 ± 0.10 and values >0.70 are considered to be abnormal. A renal Doppler RI may also help in detecting early renal dysfunction or predicting short-term reversibility of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. A recent meta-analysis suggested that RI may be a predictor of persistent AKI in critically ill patients with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.88) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88) (Ninet et al. 2015).

Increased renal resistive index (RRI) has been proven to be an independent predictor of worse cardiovascular and renal outcomes, especially when combined with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), thus providing a useful diagnostic complement to the assessment of renal function in these patients. High RRI has also been correlated with the presence of hypertensive and atherosclerotic organ damage. Values >0.80 have been reported to be predictive of all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease patients and may indicate impending renal transplant failure in this patient subset (Barozzi et al. 2007; Guinot et al. 2013; Ninet et al. 2015; Schnell et al. 2012).

Gastrointestinal and urinary tract sonography (GUTS) protocol


Gastrointestinal function can be assessed with US, using a combination of anatomical, functional and blood flow evaluation (Schmidt et al. 2005).
  1. Function: peristalsis, bowel motility, gastroparesis, small bowel ileus, large bowel paralysis
  2. Dimensions: bowel dilatation, bowel obstruction, Ogilvie syndrome, bacterial overgrowth, toxic megacolon, bowel wall oedema, abdominal wall oedema
  3. Collections: bowel content (blood, liquid, air, solid), haematoma, gastrointestinal bleeding, ascites
  4. Perfusion: bowel ischaemia, hepatosplanchnic perfusion, shock state (spontaneous contrast), renal resistive index, abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) = mean arterial pressure (MAP)-intraabdominal pressure (IAP)
This approach is summarised by the GUTS (Gastrointestinal and Urinary Tract Sonography) protocol (Figure 3). The structured and stepwise approach may lead to improved practical management of adult ICU patients with acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI), as graded by the European Consensus Definitions (Reintam Blaser et al. 2012). Such a management strategy has not been shown to improve patient outcome, however.


The European Consensus Definition of AGI suggests a graded severity score:
  1. AGI grade I represents a self-limiting condition with increased risk of developing GI dysfunction or failure
  2. AGI grade II (GI dysfunction) represents a condition requiring interventions to restore GI function
  3. AGI grade III (GI failure) represents a condition when GI function cannot be restored with interventions
  4. AGI grade IV represents a dramatically manifesting GI failure, which is immediately life-threatening (e.g. abdominal compartment syndrome with organ dysfunction) (Reintam Blaser et al. 2012).


Future works


Contrast-enhanced ultrasound


Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) involves the use of contrast agents containing gas-filled microbubbles administered intravenously, producing an image with greater contrast and/or highlighting more vascular areas. Although reasonably well established in radiology, and more recently cardiology departments, its use in intensive care is in its infancy. Unlike CT contrast agents, CEUS appears safe for patients with renal dysfunction and the modality itself remains free of radiation exposure to patients. Possible use within critical care includes enhanced echocardiography and in blunt abdominal trauma to assess solid-organ injuries (Dietrich 2017).

 
Doppler analysis as a marker of fluid status and venous congestion


As mentioned, Doppler analysis of the vasculature of specific abdominal organs allows for assessment of its perfusion. Some early work showed that this modality could also be used as a marker of systemic vascular congestion (Lewis et al. 1989).

Conclusion

 This paper summarises the multiple uses of abdominal US on the ICU and highlights future work and development. It must be remembered however that despite the myriad of potential diagnosis, utilisation and interpretation of such techniques requires training and experience.

Acknowledgements and conflicts of interest 


Jonny Wilkinson is a member of the International Fluid Academy (IFA) faculty. Manu Malbrain is founding President of WSACS (The Abdominal Compartment Society) and current Treasurer, he is also member of the medical advisory Board of Getinge (former Pulsion Medical Systems) and Serenno medical, and consults for ConvaTec, Acelity, Spiegelberg and Holtech Medical. He is co-founder and member of the executive committee of the International Fluid Academy (IFA). 

Adrian Wong is a member of the executive committee of the IFA.

Abbreviations 

FAST Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma 
GI gastrointestinal 
POCUS point-of-care ultrasound 
US ultrasound

Thứ Năm, 6 tháng 8, 2020

Pediatric EDs using more ultrasound, MRI instead of CT

By Erik L. Ridley, AuntMinnie staff writer

August 3, 2020 -- Although pediatric emergency departments (EDs) performed fewer CT exams between 2009 and 2018, their utilization of advanced imaging increased overall due to expanded use of MRI and ultrasound exams, according to research published online August 3 in JAMA Pediatrics

A research team led by Dr. Jennifer Marin of UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh assessed the change in CT, ultrasound, and MRI rates in over 26 million ED visits archived in the Pediatric Health Information System administrative database from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018.

They found that the proportion of pediatric ED encounters that resulted in a CT exam decreased amid expanded use of ultrasound and MRI. But there was also considerable variation in utilization between practices.

"The magnitude of the decrease in CT use varied by site and was associated, in part, with the use of alternative advanced imaging modalities for certain diagnoses, most notably ultrasonography for abdominal conditions," they wrote. "Future efforts appear to be needed to standardize imaging approaches and evaluate the effect of the changing

landscape of advanced imaging on patient-level outcomes."

Change in use of advanced imaging in pediatric ED
 20092018
At least one advanced imaging study6.4%8.7%
CT3.9%2.9%
Ultrasound2.5%5.8%
MRI0.3%0.6%
*All differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively).

Delving further into the data, the researchers found that most of the decrease in CT occurred in eight all patient-refined diagnosis-related groups (APR-DRGs), led by concussion (-23%), appendectomy (-14.9%), ventricular shunt procedures (-13.3%), and migraine and other headaches (-12.4%). Declines in CT use also occurred in other disorders of the nervous system (-10.1%); abdominal pain (-6.1%); other ear, nose, mouth, throat, and cranial or facial diagnoses (-5.9%); and seizure (-5.3%).

The researchers also found that strategies to reduce abdominal CT use by performing ultrasound first for evaluating abdominal pain may be associated with the higher use of ultrasound for that application.

"Interestingly, the increase in the use of ultrasonography for these conditions was greater than the decrease in the use of CT," they wrote. "Therefore, a proportion of these ultrasonographic examinations likely represent overuse of a typically widely available and nonradiating imaging tool."

In other findings, the researchers observed wide variation among EDs in the use of ultrasound for appendectomy (median 57.5%), as well as MRI (median 15.8%) and CT (median 69.5%) for ventricular shunt procedures.

In terms of outcomes, the researchers found that hospitalization and three-day ED revisits decreased during the study period. However, the ED length of stay did not change.

While it's encouraging that lower utilization of CT avoided radiation exposure in nearly 28,000 fewer kids, the increase in the number of children receiving at least one form of advanced imaging was less encouraging from a healthcare value perspective, according to an accompanying editorial by Dr. Alan Schroeder and Dr. Alan Imler of Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA.

Although outcomes appeared to have improved somewhat during the study period, other secular trends -- such as heightened public awareness of concussions -- might also explain those outcomes, wrote Schroeder and Imler. Increased imaging among patients who were ultimately hospitalized also further suggests that the more imaging is not associated with reduced hospitalization.