Tổng số lượt xem trang

Thứ Ba, 22 tháng 4, 2014

MEDULLARY THYROID CARCINOMA (MTC) with REMARKABLE CALCIFICATIONS



Various patterns of calcifications may be seen in thyroid cancers  on ultrasonography  (USG)  of thyroid. Coarse calcifications seen in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) are generally associated with posterior shadowing  on thyroid ultrasound.
 We briefly report this case  of MTC with an emphasis on its radiological features.

A  45-year-old  post-menopausal  female presented with  a goiter  (8  cm  ×  7  cm)  of  ten years duration. History was uneventful otherwise. Thyroid function tests were: free T3-2.20 pg/ml  (ref.  range: 1.71-  3.71), free T4-1.18  ng/100ml (ref. range: 0.7-1.48) and TSH-1.42 µIU/ml (ref. range: 0.35-4.94)  respectively. Subsequently,  thyroid  ultrasound revealed prominent  calcifications and increasedvascularity  (Figure 1), (Figure 2).
Computed Tomography (CT) scan  of neck showed large (80 mm × 78 mm) well defined, calcified mass lesion in the left lobe of the thyroid (Figure  3).  Fine  needle aspiration biopsy  (FNAB) confirmed evidence of MTC. A highly elevated calcitonin (20,000  pg/ml) (ref. range: < 5 pg/ml) was consistent with the diagnosis of  MTC.
MTC  may be associated with dense, irregular foci  of calcifications which  are in contrast with  homogeneous calcifications of other thyroid  tumors.  MTC,  first described by Hazard et al. in 1959, has become the focus of increasing clinical and experimental investigations.
However,  in thyroid carcinomas,  ultrasonographic evidence of an  abundance of calcifications may be  rarely seen nowadays due to improved health awareness and earlier diagnosis. To conclude, in an asymptomatic patient with long  standing goiter, coarse macrocalcifications in imaging findings should make the physician vigilant in ruling out MTC. 


Thứ Hai, 14 tháng 4, 2014

Anal and Rectal Endosonography in Clinical Practice







Anal (EcoA) and rectal endosonography (EcoEAR) is a useful test in the evaluation of patients with anorectal pathology. However, there is no clear consensus on its indications. 

The aim of this study was to determine the opinion of clinicians regarding the current indications and usefulness of this diagnostic test in daily clinical practice. 

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a survey sent to the services of General surgery in a specific area of Spain. 

The clinical usefulness of the test was evaluated using an analog scale from 0 (lowest value) to 10 (maximum utility) for each pathology. Of the 47 hospitals, 23 responded to the questionnaire (48.9%). The average number of ultrasounds performed in these centers was 217 per year (standard deviation: 140.1, range 73–450) during the last 3 years. 


 
The most common indications for this test were: rectal tumor (85%), anal fistula (80%), and fecal incontinence (70%). This test was suggested more, depending on availability in the hospital itself. In conclusion, anal and rectal endosonography remains a very useful diagnostic clinical test in the opinion of clinicians in general and digestive surgery, especially in the evaluation of patients with anal fistula, fecal incontinence, or rectal tumors.