Tổng số lượt xem trang

Thứ Sáu, 25 tháng 6, 2021

Short US screening intervals improve liver cancer outcomes

By Amerigo Allegretto, AuntMinnie.com staff writer


June 25, 2021 -- Ultrasound screenings with shorter intervals for high-risk patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may save more lives and improve quality of life, according to research published June 24 in JAMA Network Open.

The results suggest a relatively easy way to improve HCC patient outcomes, wrote a team led by Dr. Shih-Chiang Kuo from the National Cheng Kung University Hospital in Taiwan.

"Our finding shows a clear indication of saving life-years and quality of life, and clinicians can use this knowledge to remind their patients, especially those with viral infection and/or cirrhosis of liver," said Dr. Jung-Der Wang, one of the study's co-authors.

Hepatocellular carcinoma accounts for most liver cancer cases. But despite improvements in medical technology and treatment, the five-year survival rate of HCC remains low, according to Kuo's team.

Early detection by screening is recommended by medical societies, but some research does not support six-month screening intervals using abdominal ultrasonography. Along with that, an "inadequate" number of high-risk patients do not adhere to regular screenings, the authors noted.

"Many patients with viral hepatitis B or C infection, or, cirrhosis of liver might feel tired of such examinations after negative results of the initial several years," Wang told AuntMinnie.com. "Then, many of them would consider that they might not be the unlucky one who would later develop HCC and stop the biannual screening ultrasonography."

Kuo and colleagues sought to investigate the optimal interval of ultrasonography screening for early diagnosis of HCC among high-risk patients via a study that included 59,194 patients; of these, 42,081 were men (average age, 62.2 years) and 17,113 were women (average age, 69).

The team found the longer the interval between ultrasonography screenings, the higher the loss of life expectancy and loss of quality-adjusted life expectancy for both men and women.

Loss of quality-adjusted life years by ultrasound screening interval period in patients with HCC
Gender6 months12 months24 months36 monthsMore than 36 months
Men1011.112.113.114.6
Women99.710.310.711.4

The authors also noted that patients with underlying hepatitis B virus infection or cirrhosis had the greatest improvement in life expectancy with shorter screening intervals.

Although multiple medical societies recommend ultrasonography screening for HCC every six to 12 months, the researchers found that only 31.4% of men and 42.2% of women with HCC in Taiwan underwent ultrasonography within six months before diagnosis, and only 39.3% of men and 51.9% of women underwent such screening within 12 months.

"Moreover, among those with underlying liver cirrhosis, only 35.5% of men and 49.1% of women underwent ultrasonography within six months before HCC diagnosis, indicating underutilization of ultrasonography screening in Taiwan," the team wrote.

The study highlights the fact that use of ultrasound for early detection of HCC could be improved, according to the authors.

"The results of this study suggest that regular ultrasonography screening with an interval of six to 12 months or less may lead to early detection of HCC and may save lives and improve utility for patients with HCC from a lifetime perspective," they concluded. "Because people with underlying risk factors ... showed only slightly more frequent ultrasonography screening than those without ... we recommend improving this clinical practice."

Wang told AuntMinnie.com that the team is looking into what even more frequent screening, namely three months, would do for patients, as well as the cost-effectiveness of such screening in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year saved.

Thứ Ba, 22 tháng 6, 2021

Elastography helpful in breast microcalcification cases

By Amerigo Allegretto, AuntMinnie.com staff writer


June 21, 2021 -- Shear-wave elastography could be useful in helping decide whether women undergoing breast screening should receive a second biopsy or excision when it comes to suspicious microcalcifications, according to research published June 11 in Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

A team led by Dr. Yasemin Kayadibi from Istanbul University in CerrahpaŞa in Turkey found that despite biopsy being recommended for showing suspicious microcalcifications, 2D shear-wave elastography is a "useful" method for characterizing microcalcifications that can be visualized with ultrasonography.

"We believe that shear-wave elastography may assist, when the pathologic and radiologic findings are discordant, in the decision to send a patient for a second biopsy or excision," Kayadibi and her team wrote. "We [also] believe that identifying the most pathologic area using elastography with ultrasonography is more practical and efficient in clinical practice."

About 25% of cancers with suspicious microcalcifications presented on mammography consist of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

While most DCIS cases can be diagnosed through the presence of suspicious microcalcifications on mammograms classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, only 10% to 43% of microcalcifications that are considered suspicious and subjected to biopsy end up being diagnosed as malignant, the study authors wrote.

Stereotactic biopsy is the recommended method for assessing these microcalcifications, but the researchers noted their reported disadvantages; these include extended compression of the breast, radiation, and the requirement for expensive equipment.

To assess the value of shear-wave elastography, the team evaluated 50 patients with an average age of 43.7 years who presented with suspicious microcalcifications and without accompanying masses. The patients underwent ultrasonography and 2D shear-wave elastography before biopsy.

Out of the 50 patients, 27 malignant lesions were found, including 18 invasive ductal carcinomas, one invasive lobular, and eight DCIS. The remaining 23 lesions were found to be benign. There was a statistically significant difference between the shear-wave elastography values of malignant and benign microcalcifications.

Diagnostic performance of shear-wave elastography for suspicious breast lesions
 MalignancyInvasivenessHigh grade
Sensitivity93%83%88%
Specificity91%88%53%
Positive predictive value93%94%44%
Negative predictive value91%70%90%
Area under the curve0.9520.8850.776

However, the authors said that biopsy remains the best option for suspicious microcalcifications that show up on mammography images.

"Additional studies are required to verify the factors influencing the decision to perform biopsy for microcalcifications, because our study was conducted with a limited number of cases," they wrote. 

The team also said that more comprehensive studies with long-term follow-up are needed to support these findings.